Following a years-long dispute with the city’s transit regulator, Uber has earned a 30-month license to continue operating in London, Transport for London (TfL) said on Saturday. “Uber has been granted a London private hire vehicle operator’s license for a period of two and a half years,” a TfL spokesperson told .
We’re delighted to announce @TfL has granted Uber a new 30 month licence in London. TfL rightly holds our industry to the highest regulatory and safety standards and we are pleased to have met their high bar.
— Uber UK (@UberUK) March 26, 2022
Uber’s dispute with TfL dates back to when the agency said the company wasn’t “fit and proper” to operate in the city and went on to revoke its taxi license. Among other issues, TfL said Uber had failed to properly conduct driver background checks and report serious criminal offenses. Uber that decision. And while a court went on to grant it to clean up its act, TfL eventually revoked the company’s license again in , noting at the time it had shown a “pattern of failures” in the past. Subsequently, Uber another court decision in 2020 that gave it a new 18-month license that came with conditions designed to monitor its adherence to local regulations.
On Twitter, Uber said it was “delighted” by TfL’s decision, noting the agency “rightly holds our industry to the highest regulatory and safety standards,” and that it was “pleased to have met their high bar.” But not everyone is happy about the decision.
ADCU statement on @SadiqKhan‘s decision to license Uber as ‘fit and proper’ despite the failure of the Silicon Valley/Amsterdam based company to comply with the Supreme Court ruling on worker rights. pic.twitter.com/bKfFyAsL0k
— ADCU (@ADCUnion) March 26, 2022
“This is yet another tragically missed opportunity for [London Mayor] Sadiq Khan to make worker rights a condition of license for Uber to finally bring an end to the abuse of 100,000 gig workers licensed by Transport for London,” the App Drivers and Couriers Union following the announcement. The group accused the company of failing to comply with a UK Supreme Court ruling from law year that the company should treat its drivers as .